Tuesday, February 02, 2010

Rethinking Her Approach

Howard is quoted as saying she opposed efforts to change to an ordinance prohibiting guns in public parks to comply with a state law passed in 2007 and upheld by the Ohio Supreme Court in 2008, calling the idea that anyone would want to carry a concealed firearm in a public park "ridiculous."

...Howard admits she didn't understand Ohio's concealed carry law when she made the comments...[More]
So she wanted to impose her ignorance and prejudice on others under force of law. What other words besides "malpractice" would you use to describe that?

Does anyone really think this "Republican" is "rethinking her stance" based on principle, as opposed to calculating political costs after party leaders pulled her aside and told her she needed to tone things down for the present? And notice she really didn't promise anything?

Yeah, let's keep acting like we can play these creatures to our advantage. That way, we can act shocked...shocked when they pull a Gillibrand on us.

2 comments:

Sean said...

When you don't live in the real world, it's difficult to understand all them dirty, messy, facts.

Anonymous said...

Ask her how she feels about gub'ment mandated insurance? Auto, home-owner, whatever.
That's how I look at carrying concealed. As insurance. I pray that I never need to use it, but it's there when I need it.

B Woodman
III-per