This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
That is because conservative and liberal mean exactly the opposite in America than they do everywhere else in the world.
Conservatives in the rest of the world support the state and thereby conserve its power. Liberals in the rest of the world are for less state power and thereby increase personal liberty, except in England where lack of testicular fortitude means they both worship the state.
In America, conservatives are those who favor a conservative reading of the Constitution (one in which the words mean they say, with the meaning the words had at the time of its writing), which by its nature limits state power, thereby increasing personal liberty.
Liberals in America are those who favor a liberal interpretation of the constitution where the terms can be redefined and meanings found where none were written, thereby increasing state power and limiting personal liberty.
American conservatives= personal liberty by adhering to the constitution.
Rest of the world conservatives= conserving and increasing state power.
The inverse for liberalism.
The reason for this is simple. America is the only nation on earth where the power resides in the people, everywhere else the power resides in the state. Conservatives of both agendas believe in protecting the source of power. The difference comes because the source of power is different and only the free experience our system of power residing in the people.
I can break it down even more simple, but this should be easy enough for anyone to understand.
I like straightarrow's analysis, but having lived in Oz all my life, I would describe the two main political parties in Oz as "outright socialist" and "only slightly less socialist".
I leave it as an exercise for the reader to determine which is which.
Here's a little science for you, David. Something as small-scale as a drain, or even a dust devil depend on local effects. For instance, I have figured out how to create whirlpools with my hands in my swimming pool, and I can spin them in either direction at will. Tornadoes are affected indirectly by the Coriolis Force, because their parent cyclones are directly affected by said force. By the time you get to hurricanes, typhoons Indian cyclones, and extratropical cyclones (the type of storms in the U.S.) THEN you have storms big enough for their spin direction to be affected by the Earth's rotation (Coriolis Force).
5 comments:
Not to confuse anyone, but the Liberals in Australia, like in Denmark, are actually right-wing.
Must be that equator thingy--winter is summer and drains circle the other way...:)
That is because conservative and liberal mean exactly the opposite in America than they do everywhere else in the world.
Conservatives in the rest of the world support the state and thereby conserve its power. Liberals in the rest of the world are for less state power and thereby increase personal liberty, except in England where lack of testicular fortitude means they both worship the state.
In America, conservatives are those who favor a conservative reading of the Constitution (one in which the words mean they say, with the meaning the words had at the time of its writing), which by its nature limits state power, thereby increasing personal liberty.
Liberals in America are those who favor a liberal interpretation of the constitution where the terms can be redefined and meanings found where none were written, thereby increasing state power and limiting personal liberty.
American conservatives= personal liberty by adhering to the constitution.
Rest of the world conservatives= conserving and increasing state power.
The inverse for liberalism.
The reason for this is simple. America is the only nation on earth where the power resides in the people, everywhere else the power resides in the state. Conservatives of both agendas believe in protecting the source of power. The difference comes because the source of power is different and only the free experience our system of power residing in the people.
I can break it down even more simple, but this should be easy enough for anyone to understand.
I like straightarrow's analysis, but having lived in Oz all my life, I would describe the two main political parties in Oz as "outright socialist" and "only slightly less socialist".
I leave it as an exercise for the reader to determine which is which.
Here's a little science for you, David. Something as small-scale as a drain, or even a dust devil depend on local effects. For instance, I have figured out how to create whirlpools with my hands in my swimming pool, and I can spin them in either direction at will. Tornadoes are affected indirectly by the Coriolis Force, because their parent cyclones are directly affected by said force. By the time you get to hurricanes, typhoons Indian cyclones, and extratropical cyclones (the type of storms in the U.S.) THEN you have storms big enough for their spin direction to be affected by the Earth's rotation (Coriolis Force).
Post a Comment