This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
I hate to let the cat out of the bag on this one, but oh well.
"Dear World, you are owed nothing from the US and its people. We help you out of the generosity of our hearts. We are good and decent people, with a bad government. This is evidenced by the fact that private aid to Africa is often double or triple that of our government aid to Africa.
"We do it because we care. But it is a gift; a hand up, not an entitlement. Don't make the mistake that it is your right to posses the fruits of our labor. We are not your servants, we are your peers."
In continued good-faith, --- Kevin Patrick, of West Virginia, Appalachia, USA.
I seriously don't feel the need to help out those poor people. They refuse to wear condoms, or take any other protective measures against the spread of HIV.
In addition, we have plenty of our own poor that could use the resources, IMO.
The most galling thing about this travesty is that they're South Africans demanding that the U.S. help them out in their disgusting lifestyle. Let them petition their own government for help. We owe them nothing, especially since they defy God and commit such unnatural acts.
According to a Wall Street Journal Article research was recently completed regarding the effect the HIV drugs had on the spread of the disease in Africa. The research found that the number of cases of HIV greatly increased after the introduction of these drugs.
Prior to the invention of these drugs HIV was a death sentence and people were terrified. They moderated their sexual behavior. Once news of a "vaccine" spread, people returned to previous promiscuous habits, mistakenly believing the drugs to be a cure, when in fact they are palliatives that have to be taken for a patient's entire life.
An interesting moral dilemma: The existence of the treatment is the proximate cause of an increase in the evil, yet how can you refuse to treat those infected?
Between the increase in patients and the fact they require a lifetime supply of expensive medicine, the relief programs rapidly ran out of money. Without enough medicine, people shared their drugs. For example a husband might share half his medication with his wife, rather than watch her die. Using diluted doses has resulted in evolution of drug resistant strains of the disease.
And of course America is expected to pay whatever amounts are necessary to allow people to avoid responsibility for their behavior. Raise taxes and waive the magic government wand and make it all go away!
8 comments:
I hate to let the cat out of the bag on this one, but oh well.
"Dear World, you are owed nothing from the US and its people. We help you out of the generosity of our hearts. We are good and decent people, with a bad government. This is evidenced by the fact that private aid to Africa is often double or triple that of our government aid to Africa.
"We do it because we care. But it is a gift; a hand up, not an entitlement. Don't make the mistake that it is your right to posses the fruits of our labor. We are not your servants, we are your peers."
In continued good-faith,
--- Kevin Patrick, of West Virginia, Appalachia, USA.
www.kevinpatrick.info
I seriously don't feel the need to help out those poor people. They refuse to wear condoms, or take any other protective measures against the spread of HIV.
In addition, we have plenty of our own poor that could use the resources, IMO.
The most galling thing about this travesty is that they're South Africans demanding that the U.S. help them out in their disgusting lifestyle. Let them petition their own government for help. We owe them nothing, especially since they defy God and commit such unnatural acts.
According to a Wall Street Journal Article research was recently completed regarding the effect the HIV drugs had on the spread of the disease in Africa. The research found that the number of cases of HIV greatly increased after the introduction of these drugs.
Prior to the invention of these drugs HIV was a death sentence and people were terrified. They moderated their sexual behavior. Once news of a "vaccine" spread, people returned to previous promiscuous habits, mistakenly believing the drugs to be a cure, when in fact they are palliatives that have to be taken for a patient's entire life.
An interesting moral dilemma: The existence of the treatment is the proximate cause of an increase in the evil, yet how can you refuse to treat those infected?
Between the increase in patients and the fact they require a lifetime supply of expensive medicine, the relief programs rapidly ran out of money. Without enough medicine, people shared their drugs. For example a husband might share half his medication with his wife, rather than watch her die. Using diluted doses has resulted in evolution of drug resistant strains of the disease.
And of course America is expected to pay whatever amounts are necessary to allow people to avoid responsibility for their behavior. Raise taxes and waive the magic government wand and make it all go away!
Crotalus, the majority of African HIV/AIDS is transmitted through heterosexual contact.
Didn't know that, Anon. However, that doesn't negate what I said about us not owing them. They know how to stop the spread of it.
Cut. Them. Off. Without. A. Dime.
I got news for South Africa,I want that 2.8 billion for me so go f#ck yourself. Oh, you already did.
Stick your demands where the sun don´t shine.
Dennis
III
Texas
Post a Comment