This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
Why didn't the 911 operator calmly explain that open carry was legal in Wisconsin, and then inquire if any illegal activity necessitating police response was taking place?
Having someone with their panties in a wad is not probable cause to stop and question anyone.
After reading comments from local residents - like the ones that begin with "they were (fill in blank) - obviously looking for trouble; bullies trying to make others uncomfortable; trying to compensate for the size of their penises; should expect to be stopped and questioned; crazy, unstable, etc; - I'm glad I don't live in that hoplophobe populated state.
Many of the comments began by stating the mindset or casting aspersions on what these people wished to accomplish.
In Arizona, visitors often call the police because someone is carrying a gun. You almost never hear about an arrest in these occurrences. More than likely the harried 911 dispatcher asks them if there was something illegal happening. If the answer is something like "the guys are carrying guns and eating hamburgers" the dispatcher will most likely tell them there's nothing either wrong or illegal about that.
After reading some of the comments, it's clear why this country is in such deep trouble. Many folks actually appear to wish harm on law abiding citizens who carry guns.
"...The [disorderly conduct] statute does not require an actual disturbance take place, only that conduct in question is of a type that tends to cause or provoke a disturbance...."
"...Officers should conduct a thorough investigation to determine whether any violations of state statute or city ordinance have occurred. Some of the relevant offenses to consider include..." [emphasis added]
"It is my expectation that MPD officers encountering individuals who are armed with firearms in public places will take a pro-enforcement approach. If the investigation shows probable cause for a violation, the suspect should be arrested or cited."
They're just making it up as they go along. Deliberately seeking or fabricating excuses to destroy people's lives.
4 comments:
Why didn't the 911 operator calmly explain that open carry was legal in Wisconsin, and then inquire if any illegal activity necessitating police response was taking place?
Having someone with their panties in a wad is not probable cause to stop and question anyone.
After reading comments from local residents - like the ones that begin with "they were (fill in blank) - obviously looking for trouble; bullies trying to make others uncomfortable; trying to compensate for the size of their penises; should expect to be stopped and questioned; crazy, unstable, etc; - I'm glad I don't live in that hoplophobe populated state.
Many of the comments began by stating the mindset or casting aspersions on what these people wished to accomplish.
In Arizona, visitors often call the police because someone is carrying a gun. You almost never hear about an arrest in these occurrences. More than likely the harried 911 dispatcher asks them if there was something illegal happening. If the answer is something like "the guys are carrying guns and eating hamburgers" the dispatcher will most likely tell them there's nothing either wrong or illegal about that.
After reading some of the comments, it's clear why this country is in such deep trouble. Many folks actually appear to wish harm on law abiding citizens who carry guns.
That's creepy.
That's creepy.
We can get creepier. Official press release from the City of Madison:
"...The [disorderly conduct] statute does not require an actual disturbance take place, only that conduct in question is of a type that tends to cause or provoke a disturbance...."
"...Officers should conduct a thorough investigation to determine whether any violations of state statute or city ordinance have occurred. Some of the relevant offenses to consider include..." [emphasis added]
"It is my expectation that MPD officers encountering individuals who are armed with firearms in public places will take a pro-enforcement approach. If the investigation shows probable cause for a violation, the suspect should be arrested or cited."
They're just making it up as they go along. Deliberately seeking or fabricating excuses to destroy people's lives.
Well, it could have been at a Costco.
Post a Comment