This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
The blog links to a WashPo story scolding Realco Guns in Maryland as being a major provider of "Crime Guns".
Realco is located in PG County, just a mile or two from the DC line. This is a roughneck area. It is also one of the only gun shops in the entire area.
Does it not make sense that a percentage of the guns purchased from a store in a bad area will find their way into bad hands?
Does anyone doubt for a moment that if ATF had a beef with the way Realco was doing business, that they would have shut them down years ago? Just FYI: Realco is (or at least was) a Class III dealer, so we all know the oversight from ATF is strict.
Bad people do bad things.
But what WashPo failed to research...how many firearms sold by Realco during their 18 years of business were used by good Citizens to protect home, hearth and health? How many local residents owe their lives to guns purchased from Realco?
I would bet dollars to doughnuts that number is much, much higher than the number of "crime guns".
There are enough true villians in the world, WashPo and their Liberal audience need not try to make more villians of gun merchants.
FWIW, I sent to this to the Post's LTE e-mail addy:
I just read your first article concerning the Hidden Life of Guns. If I may be so bold as to summarize:
1) Certain gun stores have higher incidences of so-called "crime guns" that are traced back to them. 2) The number one store mentioned, Realco, has been subject to numerous inspections over the years, every one of which revealed that Realco has scrupulously complied with the law, and that most "crime guns" traced back to the store have therefor been the result of illegal "straw purchases", of which Realco had no knowledge when the original purchase was made. 3)The guns are traced back when a person who is legally barred from having a weapon is in fact found to be in possession of such a weapon.
So basically you've spent the last year putting together an investigative series demonstrating that Realco operates in an area where the local citizenry goes out of its way to circumvent or outright subvert the law. You are then shocked and amazed that people willing to break the law to purchase a weapon that they are legally barred from owning further break the law by using the weapon to murder, maim, or intimidate (which, I believe are also illegal).
Good work folks!
I doubt it will ever see ink on their pages, but what the hell...
2 comments:
The blog links to a WashPo story scolding Realco Guns in Maryland as being a major provider of "Crime Guns".
Realco is located in PG County, just a mile or two from the DC line. This is a roughneck area. It is also one of the only gun shops in the entire area.
Does it not make sense that a percentage of the guns purchased from a store in a bad area will find their way into bad hands?
Does anyone doubt for a moment that if ATF had a beef with the way Realco was doing business, that they would have shut them down years ago? Just FYI: Realco is (or at least was) a Class III dealer, so we all know the oversight from ATF is strict.
Bad people do bad things.
But what WashPo failed to research...how many firearms sold by Realco during their 18 years of business were used by good Citizens to protect home, hearth and health? How many local residents owe their lives to guns purchased from Realco?
I would bet dollars to doughnuts that number is much, much higher than the number of "crime guns".
There are enough true villians in the world, WashPo and their Liberal audience need not try to make more villians of gun merchants.
Sam
III
FWIW, I sent to this to the Post's LTE e-mail addy:
I just read your first article concerning the Hidden Life of Guns. If I may be so bold as to summarize:
1) Certain gun stores have higher incidences of so-called "crime guns" that are traced back to them.
2) The number one store mentioned, Realco, has been subject to numerous inspections over the years, every one of which revealed that Realco has scrupulously complied with the law, and that most "crime guns" traced back to the store have therefor been the result of illegal "straw purchases", of which Realco had no knowledge when the original purchase was made.
3)The guns are traced back when a person who is legally barred from having a weapon is in fact found to be in possession of such a weapon.
So basically you've spent the last year putting together an investigative series demonstrating that Realco operates in an area where the local citizenry goes out of its way to circumvent or outright subvert the law. You are then shocked and amazed that people willing to break the law to purchase a weapon that they are legally barred from owning further break the law by using the weapon to murder, maim, or intimidate (which, I believe are also illegal).
Good work folks!
I doubt it will ever see ink on their pages, but what the hell...
Post a Comment