Here's more of what the subguns boys are trying to keep their members from seeing.
But keep up the comments, fellas--funny how you're allowed to express your views on my site.
Monday, November 29, 2010
More Suppressed Machine Gun Fire
The apologists are out in force in comments here. Seems the idea of doing things openly doesn't set well with those who have appointed themselves our representatives--and their lackeys. Funny how they have more of a problem with people who want to know the details than they do with BATFU.
Here's more of what the subguns boys are trying to keep their members from seeing.
Which lasted until noticed:
But keep up the comments, fellas--funny how you're allowed to express your views on my site.
Here's more of what the subguns boys are trying to keep their members from seeing.
But keep up the comments, fellas--funny how you're allowed to express your views on my site.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Subguns.com only retains discussions for a few days and they do not archive them. Currently the oldest post on the moderated message boards is from 11/28/10 at 19:13. The thread you are referencing is from 11/28/10 at 10:02 which means it has likely been automatically purged like every discussion there is whether it's active or not. It's one of the things I detest about Subguns.com's discussion boards but it is hardly a conspiracy.
Looking at the names of some of those involved in the discussion I'd say that if the Subguns moderators were going to "censor" the board, they would have done so instead of participating in the thread!
Oops...was looking at "Moderated" board and not the NFA Board. Nevermind! Not sure what is going on there, there are some far older posts. Hmmm...
Nope--this thread is still there, if you click on the link I provide and then wait a moment for it to redirect:
New ATF Regs concerning Ammo over 50BMG -- Mike -- 11/25/10 22:06
* Does that mean .50 BMG ATI tounds are bad -- me -- 11/27/10 12:27
o "over 50bmg" words mean things:D - NTXT -- Jay Bell -- 11/27/10 13:47
* Safe Explosives Act - passed in 2002 -- Jason M. Wong, Firearms Law Group -- 11/26/10 22:38
o Lahti, Solothurn, PTRS/PTRD, Boys.... -- Greybeard -- 11/27/10 16:48
o As far as I know, if it's got sporting purposes... -- Some Big Bore Owner -- 11/27/10 14:29
o Re: Safe Explosives Act - passed in 2002 -- NM -- 11/27/10 00:12
o also Shotgun slugs? exempt? - NTXT -- Jeff L -- 11/26/10 22:57
o Does that mean all 37mm & 40mm rounds are -- Jeff L -- 11/26/10 22:56
* Over 50 caliber, or more powerful than 50BMG? -- Tony Rumore -- 11/26/10 17:32
o Re: Over 50 caliber, or more powerful than 50BMG? -- Jeff -- 11/29/10 09:42
* Wait a minute, the link is that NFATCA is working. -- Glen in OK -- 11/26/10 15:49
* Did NFATCA try to stop this? -- Glen in OK -- 11/26/10 15:47
o If you read the text it says. -- Joel -- 11/26/10 15:59
+ It states: this was "flying under the radar" ?? -- HFTech -- 11/26/10 16:46
# Depends on how you define that -- Diomed -- 11/26/10 17:05
* You never even sent a Christmas Card? -- HFTech -- 11/26/10 18:39
o The first I heard about this was SAR East 2009 -- Diomed -- 11/27/10 14:49
#
*
o
+
#
*
# sounds like a stiffing for DD owners -- whiskerz -- 11/26/10 14:18
* Please cite GA law... -- Anon. -- 11/27/10 15:41
o Re: Please cite GA law... -- HW Stone -- 11/27/10 19:22
# Is over .50 BMG or includes .50 BMG "and" over? - NTXT -- Annonimattos -- 11/26/10 11:45
* "We'll decide that when we prosecute you" - NTXT -- Freddy the Fed -- 11/26/10 16:16
o Maybe I should write a letter ?. - NTXT -- Guilty Of Larsony -- 11/27/10 19:40
# Perhaps We NFATCA Members and Others Concerned... -- Dave Bane in Richmond IN -- 11/26/10 09:52
This is not due to an automatic cascading off the site of a thread--this is a deliberate censoring of comments they wish to suppress. They deleted Len Savage's post within a few hours and then ditto on the post linking to my GRE column.
Post a Comment