Friday, January 21, 2011

Canada home firebombing case shows evil of anti-defense laws

If anything, Mr. Thomson showed great restraint—anyone throwing Molotov cocktails at an occupied house deserves to be repelled using any and all force necessary, including lethal. [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column  returns fire at the arson enablers.

Also put a little something extra in the collection plate this Sunday.

Share the link?

1 comment:

Defender said...

From the land of Patrick Henry and Edgar Allan Poe, greetings.
Every day I wake up and log on to see what fresh hell presents itself to the minds of reasonable men.
The authorities' response to Mr. Thomson's restraint -- that repelling terrorist thug attempted-murdering arsonists NONlethally -- will be punished to the full extent of the law -- forces us down a narrowing cone of choices.
Let them kill you and yours and be eulogized as a good, nonviolent second-class citi-- er, subject.
Set YOURSELF on fire in protest and then shoot YOURSLF. The stupid, it burns.
Lay waste your would-be murderers and gear up with your main battle rifle for the next wave.
Liberty? Nevermore.
Liberty, THEN Death.