Public universities are covered under the “sensitive places” exception noted by the D.C. v. Heller dictum, and the government may ban gun possession there. [More]
See, that's what "shall not be infringed" means. And that's what oaths by robed traitors mean.
Speaking of "sensitive places"...
6 comments:
My advice is, do what you gotta do to ensure your safety and the safety of those around you.
I'm having my surprise metal-detector nightmares again.
Another sensitive place.
I was looking for an update on Paul Henick, whose trial for brandishing his FINGER was to have been Jan. 4.
"On Saturday October 17th, hundreds of gun owners turned out for the VCDL (Virginia Citizens Defense League) Freedom Rally to protest the 7th District Republican Party holding their "Roundup" event every year at the anti-gun SnagAJob/Innsbrook Pavilion."
Innsbrook is where 7th District Congressman and majority leader Eric "PATRIOT Act/Freedom Fondles" Cantor has his Richmond office, too. Guns are PROBABLY OK in the office park at large, just not in the Pavilion.
Sensitive areas... oh, like places mass killers love to haunt?
Huh? Why, they can't take a gun in there... it's ILLEGAL!!!
A prison is a "sensitive place" with special security requirements.
However, an open college campus, where anyone can come and go, is an ordinary place with no special security needs. There is no reason to restrict firearms carry there, aside from that being the wishes of left-leaning, anti-gun rights academics, and the anti-gun rights judges who rule in their favor.
Such political whims are not sufficient reason to send someone to prison for carrying on campus, when we have the individual right to keep and bear arms. Campus whimsy is unquestionably trumped by the gravity of the US Constitution.
This makes Virginia Tech a 'sensitive place', ensuring that NO law abiding students or faculty have the means to defend themselves. What could possibly go wrong?
And only miles from Jefferson's Monticello.
You may already be a mobile "sensitive place."
This is very confusingly written, but it sounds like if someone makes a Freedom of Information Act request to the federal government, the request is forwarded to Janet Napolitano's office so it can gather information on THEM.
The Republicans are looking into it, and other abuses of the Obama administration, supposedly. Good PR anyway, right, Eric "PATRIOT Act/Freedom Fondles" Cantor?
http://headlines.verizon.com/headlines/portals/headlines.portal?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=headlines_portal_page__article&_article=3281690
Post a Comment