That's why even those of us who strongly support the Second Amendment...[More]Clifford D. May shows everyone his big "but."
And then he tries to sell us on Peter King being "dedicated to protecting individuals' Second Amendment rights."
Anybody think smooth, worm-tongued neocons are not more insidiously subversive than outright raving "progressives"?
4 comments:
Ignoring the Fifth Amendment's due process clause:
No person shall ...be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law...
To me this is more of a Fifth Amendment case than a Second.
They're abusing the 5th to infringe the 2nd. And don't forget that in Indiana, the 4th is now null and void.
I really don't give a rat's bee-hind what number they're going after since it's obvious the goal is all of them, and my ultimate response is going to be "extra-legal" anyway.
With the 5th Amendment in trouble here, the 4th Amendment in trouble in Illinois, New York, New Jersey and California, the President's office threatening the 1st Amendment by omitting journalists from networks not deemed to be "fair" to the President, combined with the thieving Congress's (redudant, sorry) "budget" deficits, can it be long until every household gets a soldier quartered in it to save money? And you thought the 3d Amendment was a dead letter.
If these assaults on the 1st, 4th, and 5th Amendments stand, I don't see the 8th Amendment holding, either, not with public frustration at criminals and revolving door justice.
The verification word is mushi, which always has described the minds of leftists.
Post a Comment