Thursday, June 23, 2011

‘A Tale of Two Pharmacies’ shows danger of giving attackers what they want

I wonder if corporate risk management departments ever factor in a liability for the results of policies prohibiting armed defense? [More]
Today's Gun Rights Examiner column looks at two different outcomes...no wait, make that three...

Also: Watch Trigger Sports Recorded, view Gunwalker Cartoons and Join the Resistance!

1 comment:

Divemedic said...

Our government, through the court system, has guaranteed these "no guns" policies by making a business owner liable for what his employees and customers do in self defense, but insulating them from liability for what a criminal does.

Employee or customer shooting= lawsuit
criminal shooting= no lawsuit

There is no liability for allowing a criminal to kill your employees and customers.