This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
The family's views on criminal prosecution shouldn't count for much in any criminal case. They aren't witnesses, and only indirectly victims.
Nice to see that they are looking at a civil suit. That is where they do get to decide how things proceed.
"...there may be a cause of action..."
"...there are exceptions when agencies can reasonably foresee their actions will do harm."
"...multiple warnings to supervisors that the program was going to kill people."
I hope they win big.
Congress needs to undo the damage it has done to our rights by eliminating the firearms function of the rogue agency it created. There's really no "F" in ATF, it's really the manifestation of an out of control Congress. Clean up the US Congress, and the unconstitutional, "F" nightmare disappears into history like other infamous government organizations, such as the Stasi and the SS. We didn’t need them, and we don’t need the "F'ers" at ATF.
Nothing will change until the mundanes actually obtain grand jury access. I once wrote a proposal on the matter, (back when I was working in the legal field) the essence of which provided that an attorney (an officer of the court) could obtain and present evidence to a grand jury on behalf of a victim harmed by government actors.
A civil proceeding is not a realistic remedy for most folks - especially when the victim is pursuing legal action against the largest law firm in the world - the DOJ. It likely takes 50 grand to simply get the ball rolling in such a case.
Incidentally, DOJ is charged with defending their client - the U.S. Government. Pretty much makes any criminal action pursued by DOJ a conflict of interest - especially since a conviction may open the door to a civil action, which the DOJ will also defend...
Not that it matters, but it should be noted that the Terry family attorney in this matter is Paul Charlton, former U.S. Attorney for the state of Arizona.
3 comments:
The family's views on criminal prosecution shouldn't count for much in any criminal case. They aren't witnesses, and only indirectly victims.
Nice to see that they are looking at a civil suit. That is where they do get to decide how things proceed.
"...there may be a cause of action..."
"...there are exceptions when agencies can reasonably foresee their actions will do harm."
"...multiple warnings to supervisors that the program was going to kill people."
I hope they win big.
Congress needs to undo the damage it has done to our rights by eliminating the firearms function of the rogue agency it created. There's really no "F" in ATF, it's really the manifestation of an out of control Congress. Clean up the US Congress, and the unconstitutional, "F" nightmare disappears into history like other infamous government organizations, such as the Stasi and the SS. We didn’t need them, and we don’t need the "F'ers" at ATF.
Nothing will change until the mundanes actually obtain grand jury access.
I once wrote a proposal on the matter, (back when I was working in the legal field) the essence of which provided that an attorney (an officer of the court) could obtain and present evidence to a grand jury on behalf of a victim harmed by government actors.
A civil proceeding is not a realistic remedy for most folks - especially when the victim is pursuing legal action against the largest law firm in the world - the DOJ. It likely takes 50 grand to simply get the ball rolling in such a case.
Incidentally, DOJ is charged with defending their client - the U.S. Government.
Pretty much makes any criminal action pursued by DOJ a conflict of interest - especially since a conviction may open the door to a civil action, which the DOJ will also defend...
Not that it matters, but it should be noted that the Terry family attorney in this matter is Paul Charlton, former U.S. Attorney for the state of Arizona.
Post a Comment