"I did not see any education going on; it looked like it was just fun," she said. [More]
Heavens! We can't have that!
Man, if that doesn't just define the anti-gun regresssive. This old harridan is the embodiment of Mencken's definition of Puritanism: The haunting fear that someone, somewhere, may be happy.
They call themselves "liberals," but in truth the gungrabbers are a bunch of tight-a$$ed bluenoses.
On the ever-present other hand, I talked about another report on this story on the radio show yesterday, and one of the cops interviewed said they were doing it to promote "gun control," so I lost all sympathy for their side of things.
4 comments:
Why is the "officer" wearing military style digital camo? Does this not violate the "standing army" rules?
It looked like one of the kids had a grasp of gun control. He was aiming pretty good. Maybe that's the kind of gun control they were talking about.
Perhaps the "Progressives" support Abstinence-Only education after all.
What's riskier: an "assault weapon" or a blowjob?
Depends on whom you ask...
"They call themselves 'liberals,' but in truth the gungrabbers are a bunch of tight-a$$ed bluenoses."
And they call themselves "progressives" too, but they are regressive totalitarians who lie by standing the truth upon its head.
Post a Comment