This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
Because one segment evidently has the right to make another pay for their phone and internet, too. [Read]
2 comments:
Anonymous
said...
The current creep of redistribution is not good for society. However if we are not going to create incentives for good jobs somehow, its probably inevitable.
Unfortunately the combination of social comity and necessity that created the good job boom till about 1973 is gone for good.
Worse can't lower the wage or work conditions bar low enough for the rapacious multi-nationals satisfaction as no matter what you give them, they'll try for more, more, more. Given human limits, you can't just educate your way out either.
Somehow people need good jobs, not any jobs, low paying jobs lead to a poor society, but good ones for people of average smarts and no college degree.
Until some combination of carrot and stick is used to get them, the pressure for redistribution will grow.
In short, if you don't want socialism, everybody needs to pay good wages.
I make crappy wages and I don't want socialism. It's up to me to provide something that is valued--if this doesn't work out, I'm free to try something else that is valued more.
I saw a union destroy the factory providing prosperity to an entire town and more when I was a young foreman. They went out on strike. It took me two weeks to train office workers to do their jobs at comparable production and scrap rates. If all someone has put into their market value is a skill set that anyone else can pick up in two weeks, why do they deserve to have wages artificially inflated over value?
Competition and wages in this country are stifled by socialism, not elevated, and that includes a regulatory and lawsuit burden our foreign "competitors" are happy to see us assume on our own.
And the fact remains, destructive redistributionist policy has resulted in large segments of "entitlement"-dependents who are unemployable--not just because they haven't provided themselves any skills of value, but because they are actually a liability and danger to have around.
It's a major and abominable crime against humanity that has been--and continues to be perpetrated on the least advantaged among us, to the cynical advantage of their (and our) exploiters, and life, liberty and pursuit of happiness be damned.
2 comments:
The current creep of redistribution is not good for society. However if we are not going to create incentives for good jobs somehow, its probably inevitable.
Unfortunately the combination of social comity and necessity that created the good job boom till about 1973 is gone for good.
Worse can't lower the wage or work conditions bar low enough for the rapacious multi-nationals satisfaction as no matter what you give them, they'll try for more, more, more. Given human limits, you can't just educate your way out either.
Somehow people need good jobs, not any jobs, low paying jobs lead to a poor society, but good ones for people of average smarts and no college degree.
Until some combination of carrot and stick is used to get them, the pressure for redistribution will grow.
In short, if you don't want socialism, everybody needs to pay good wages.
I make crappy wages and I don't want socialism. It's up to me to provide something that is valued--if this doesn't work out, I'm free to try something else that is valued more.
I saw a union destroy the factory providing prosperity to an entire town and more when I was a young foreman. They went out on strike. It took me two weeks to train office workers to do their jobs at comparable production and scrap rates. If all someone has put into their market value is a skill set that anyone else can pick up in two weeks, why do they deserve to have wages artificially inflated over value?
Competition and wages in this country are stifled by socialism, not elevated, and that includes a regulatory and lawsuit burden our foreign "competitors" are happy to see us assume on our own.
And the fact remains, destructive redistributionist policy has resulted in large segments of "entitlement"-dependents who are unemployable--not just because they haven't provided themselves any skills of value, but because they are actually a liability and danger to have around.
It's a major and abominable crime against humanity that has been--and continues to be perpetrated on the least advantaged among us, to the cynical advantage of their (and our) exploiters, and life, liberty and pursuit of happiness be damned.
Post a Comment