What the Founders Said About 100-Round Assault-Rifle Magazines [More]"Snark, snark! Snark!"
Gee, that's some argument you pose there, you yapping ignoramus, as you presume to teach while not having the prerequisites to even be in the class.
I love it when these regressive know-it-alls and their lemming followers trip onto their smug faces right out of the starting gate. Seriously, catch some of the comments. Good grief.
4 comments:
Anyone who really knows their Revolution history and glean from it the character and qualities of the Founding Fathers would know that if somehow they could look ahead into the future and envision ordinary Americans owning ARs, FALs, AKs and the (zOMG) 100 round mag, they would be high-fivingly, well-pleased.
This well-worn line of bullshit by Amira is fallacious and nonsensical on it's face: The American Revolution was won by ordinary citizens who rebelled against their government of the day, using weapons that were at least comparable to the military it was fighting against.
So then after claiming victory, those founding Americans would be horrified by the idea of future generations of Americans not having access to state of the art arms? Ridiculous...
I believe they said the same thing about 100 round mags that they said about typewriters and computers.
First Amendment Rights obviously don't extend to drivel posted on computers.
Right?
I become increasingly wearly of the un-educated masses that flex the First to abuse the Second. Without the might of an armed general population we'd soon have (and soon may have) neither. In the end, regardless of the odds of succeeding, I will stand to defend the rights of the even the enemies of my Right to be armed. Ironic, isn't it?
Whole lotta snark, and not a trace of truth.
Post a Comment