If Menino, a partner in New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Illegal Guns, can block a business based on political issues they support, what is to stop him from doing so based on a company’s championing of the Second Amendment, or a host of other issues that defy the so-called “progressive” agenda of government control and dominance over every aspect of citizens’ lives? Can business interest that support right to life or voter ID, or other “conservative causes” be far behind? Is it the place of government that is supposed to represent all of the people to discriminate against disapproved minorities and bestow a competitive advantage, not to mention special privileges and immunities, only to concerns that promote the agenda of the political bosses? [More]Today's Gun Rights Examiner offering notes it's unseemly and offensive for Mumbles to be choking the chicken in public.
Saturday, July 21, 2012
Menino Chick-fil-A stance shows guns aren’t only freedom ‘progressives’ threaten
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
And I'm sure the folks of Boston believe all that claptrap. The "open" and "inclusive" stuff doesn't apply to those who only want to be left alone to live their lives and defend themselves as they see fit... of course.
Americn freedom, born in Boston. Now dead there.
I would just once again note that is "Law Enforcement" who, IN SPITE OF their oath to the Constitution, enable this.
Yes, there MAY be some few honorable "Law Enforcement" officers in this country. If there are, they are only in the smallest of "Law Enforcement" organizations. And merely being a small "Law Enforcement" organization does NOT guarantee its members are honorable. "Law Enforcement" in this country makes lawyers look honorable in comparison!
The stench is overwhelming. And it smells like pig.
Post a Comment