Friday, October 26, 2012

That's a Simple Case, Alright

The guy ignored a restraining order and then a "No Guns" sign, but if a background check had been required, why we'd all be drinkin' that free Bubble Up and eatin' that rainbow stew. [More]


"And, make no mistake," he writes, "this is a conversation the American public wants to have."

Not the ones with the real money, Dan, the ones pushing you to the side, the ones taking over from you...

2 comments:

Robert Fowler said...

Like our friend Kurt asks, what part of shall not be infringed don't you understand?

Since the last 3 years that you can access they are in the negative, how does the Brady bunch even pay Danny boy?

Anonymous said...

Just tried to post a response. We'll see if it gets through. If not, here it is:

Let's review:
1) Murder has been morally and legally wrong since Cain and Abel. Apparently even God can't stop a determined murderer.
2) There was a restraining order against the murderer, which was ignored.
3) There was a "No Guns" sign posted, which the murderer ignored.

But sure - let's pass more pointless laws. Surely the next one will force a thug bent on violence to reconsider and join the church choir instead.