If they're qualified to dispense advice used to create binding policy, they ought to be able to tell us what they individually would they be prepared to do if a crazed attacker burst into one of their meetings. [Read]
Attending police and Malloy's bodyguards excluded, of course. Plus the meetings will no doubt be held in a secured location under armed protection, so never mind.
Gosh, it would be easy to issue pronouncements like "These things aren't needed for hunting deer. You don't need a 30-round clip to honor the Constitution."
That is, if you were a career liar and an elitist oath-breaking hypocrite.
Friday, January 04, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment