Editorial: Gun-control debate is personal for Chicagoans [More]You don't think it's personal for the Reese family?
You don't think it's personal for the Shipleys?
You don't think it's personal for David Olofson?
How about Brian Aitken or Keith Pantaleon or Nathan Haddad?
Do you think it might just be personal for Wayne Fincher?
It's even personal for me, you contemptible Fourth Estate Fifth Columnist, you sanctimonious, blood-dancing sob sister stool sample hiding behind editorial anonymity.
Keep trying to impose your corrupt Chi-Town machine thuggery on men who would be free, and some day it might just get personal for you.
1 comment:
personally,
malicious idiots should be quarantined and not allowed to spew in the public square against reasonableness and common sense...
http://adask.wordpress.com/2013/01/30/supreme-court-justice-scalia-the-constitution-is-dead-dead-dead/
and MASS MURDERERS should be prosecuted and executed in PUBLIC
http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/when-did-handguns-and-shotguns-become-assault-weapons/33352/
obviously the Pharisees and moneychangers exhibit the behaviour and mannerisms of their progenitor just as Jesus proclaimed. .. [John 8:44]
the nature and character of the parties acting in covinous collusion to subvert truth and justice is a function of the currency printers and media owners who also operate a crackhouse [KOSHER BROTHEL] called CONgress and subvert the peace and dignity of the soil of the Republic
--------------------------------
virtute solo excepta...
"Omnium rerum quarum usus est, potest esse abusus, virtute solo excepta."
Post a Comment