I guess you just don't have the imagination to extrapolate that to what would have happened had such capabilities -- and most importantly, such convictions and will -- been more widespread?
Yeah, someone who would be utterly helpless to protect his family depending on him to be a man finds such assertions "laughable." Yours is the cowardly, deluded mentality that makes tyranny not only possible, but inevitable, and that you would extend your self-imposed impotence on men who are your betters -- at gunpoint by police state enforcers -- makes you a particularly contemptible sort of fool. You should be hiding in shame rather than broadcasting that.
But thanks for confirming what some of us have been saying all along as a counterpoint to those lying about "common sense reasonable restrictions" to establish a beachhead from which they'll launch their next assault:
The liberal agenda once included confiscating handguns and abolishing the right to own one — never mind the right to carry one at all times.It still does, but now you have to lie about it. And you're right. You've lost.
Because ultimately, the Second Amendment means what serious men with guns say it does. And you cloistered weaklings don't have anywhere near enough jackboots to throw at us and change that dynamic.
1 comment:
"Common sense" and "Reasonable" are two of the scariest words in the gu haters vocabulary. Neither one apply to what they want. Batshit crazy Joan is always using those words in her hatful screed against the NRA.
Post a Comment