This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
I tried to send Martha a nice email, but the address posted at the bottom bounced back. here is my letter.
Dear Martha,
Your article about remedies only serves to highlight that you, the author, need schooling in the history of the second amendment. I believe though, that you will have received so much hate mail (which this is not) as a result of posting your email address, that my message will simply be deleted in haste.
The framers of the constitution believed that "THE PEOPLE" gave their consent to be governed only with the reservation that the States and the PEOPLE'S militia would take back that consent should the central government usurp its narrowly defined powers. Are you so seriously removed from current events as to not see the expansion one thousand times, nay one million times greater than intended?
Really, what are you basing your statement on when you write, "Sensible gun laws should be concerned with hunters, sporting groups and some collectors. Only in rare instances are guns needed for protection." Tell that to the woman and her twins in Georgia who hid in a crawl space only to be discovered by an intruder intent on harming her. The second amendment is NOT about duck hunting, and although you may not have been a victim of violence, you do not get to inflict your misguided rules on someone who has.
Do you consider yourself to be a good moral character? Surely, you don't believe that it is morally superior for a woman to die being raped and beaten in an alley rather than defend herself? When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.
Please read Edwin Vieira’s The Sword and Sovereignty. You may just learn something besides what your narrow policeman grandfather history has afforded you. H.
1 comment:
I tried to send Martha a nice email, but the address posted at the bottom bounced back. here is my letter.
Dear Martha,
Your article about remedies only serves to highlight that you, the author, need schooling in the history of the second amendment. I believe though, that you will have received so much hate mail (which this is not) as a result of posting your email address, that my message will simply be deleted in haste.
The framers of the constitution believed that "THE PEOPLE" gave their consent to be governed only with the reservation that the States and the PEOPLE'S militia would take back that consent should the central government usurp its narrowly defined powers. Are you so seriously removed from current events as to not see the expansion one thousand times, nay one million times greater than intended?
Really, what are you basing your statement on when you write, "Sensible gun laws should be concerned with hunters, sporting groups and
some collectors. Only in rare instances are guns needed for protection." Tell that to the woman and her twins in Georgia who hid in a crawl space only to be discovered by an intruder intent on harming her. The second amendment is NOT about duck hunting, and although you may not have been a victim of violence, you do not get to inflict your misguided rules on someone who has.
Do you consider yourself to be a good moral character? Surely, you don't believe that it is morally superior for a woman to die being raped and beaten in an alley rather than defend herself? When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.
Please read Edwin Vieira’s The Sword and Sovereignty. You may just learn something besides what your narrow policeman grandfather history has afforded you.
H.
Post a Comment