This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
Go unarmed? Apparently the author of "the plan" never heard about Tiananmen Square. He should watch the video by a guy who was THERE. http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=0v9b6LzCDO8&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D0v9b6LzCDO8
Quite familiar with TS. My intention here is NOT to force a bloodbath at every single State Capitol. It is to provide a show of force, will, solidarity and determination on our (the patriot movements') part - unmistakable in its' seriousness and resolve. If you think we're going to go to all of State capitol's ARMED, I suggest you have a SEPARATE "Go!" signal for all those with a silar death-wish. One of my most serious concerns these days is that ANY given "armed march" is going to be pre-empted via government machination into our next - and probably final - "false flag" event. Pete
There is a simplicity to it. Consequences would be visited on the participants, but those would be less than lethal. Would be interesting to watch, say, the 4th infantry attempting to deal with 20 or 30 thousand citizens...but really just dream on. When the counter rev starts only a few will stand and they will be butchered for public consumption. For now, where's my monkey wrench?
4 comments:
Go unarmed? Apparently the author of "the plan" never heard about Tiananmen Square.
He should watch the video by a guy who was THERE.
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=0v9b6LzCDO8&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D0v9b6LzCDO8
Quite familiar with TS. My intention here is NOT to force a bloodbath at every single State Capitol. It is to provide a show of force, will, solidarity and determination on our (the patriot movements') part - unmistakable in its' seriousness and resolve. If you think we're going to go to all of State capitol's ARMED, I suggest you have a SEPARATE "Go!" signal for all those with a silar death-wish. One of my most serious concerns these days is that ANY given "armed march" is going to be pre-empted via government machination into our next - and probably final - "false flag" event. Pete
There is a simplicity to it.
Consequences would be visited on the participants, but those would be less than lethal.
Would be interesting to watch, say, the 4th infantry attempting to deal with 20 or 30 thousand citizens...but really just dream on.
When the counter rev starts only a few will stand and they will be butchered for public consumption. For now, where's my monkey wrench?
I'm a little surprised at the LACK of response to this idea. It's still going on strong at other forums:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/bambqpz
Post a Comment