See, the problem with this editorial is it assumes both sides of the debate have fact-based positions of equal merit, and that citizen disarmament schemes are worthy of respect. That's bull, and it’s a denial of the truth. [More]Today's Gun Rights Examiner offering notes a divide that not only shouldn't be bridged, it can't be unless someone surrenders.
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Proposed bridge over gun divide built on shaky foundation
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment