Not that the ungulates in Seattle will exercise them.
Controlling what you can say and how you can say it: What a "progressive" idea.
"Office for Civil Rights"? Really? Was "Ministry of Truth" already taken?
But it only applies to "government workers," you say?
What do you think they think you are?
Oh wait, maybe I've been too hasty:
Officials said such exclusions are normal procedure, insisting it’s not censorship.Well, OK then...
3 comments:
Brownstain said that "citizens" should be called "residents" A more appropriate word would be "subjects" considering how government really views us
after reading about this all I can say is that there should be an award for utter dumbassedness.
something made out of a used cow pie or a dessicated road apple suspended from a frayed shoe string with color denominations.
The lighter the color the dumber the award.
Gluing flies to the award to depict the number of times the recipient 'won' the award.
Those politicians in Seattle would corner the market on said awards!
"Ban on potentially offensive language"?
So does this mean when a leftist says that the "gun lobby" is a bunch of racist old fat white men, or refers to George Zimmerman as a "white Hispanic," or talks about pro-lifers' "War on Women," they can get arrested for "potentially offensive language"?
Or will it be selectively enforced? Like, you know, everything else?
Post a Comment