Does anyone believe in such a scenario, bearing in mind the heavy hand we saw in Watertown, that a broadly-imposed martial law situation would leave gun owners unmolested? [More]Today’s Gun Rights Examiner report notes it depends on what the meaning of the term “limited strikes” is.
Sunday, September 08, 2013
Gun owners have vested interest in opposing U.S. Syrian intervention
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment