Sunday, September 22, 2013

U.K. columnist asks if world should intervene to stop U.S. ‘gun violence’

“[I]nternational pressure may be one way of reducing the slaughter over the next generation,” he concludes. “This has reached the point where it has ceased to be a domestic issue. The world cannot stand idly by.” [More]
Today’s Gun Rights Examiner counterpoint notes people who can’t even defend themselves sure do resent those who can, and they sure are indignant about it.

4 comments:

Crotalus said...

He bawls about "civil war" (he ain't seen nuthin' yet!) but it seems he wants to revive the American Revolution.

Bring it, Redcoat! We kicked your asses before; we can do it again!

Unknown said...

Bring on the UN really, I think most of the NATO country's are too smart to send troops over here. body bags are bad for morale on the home front. maybe some African country (warlord) could use the UN money and send some troops good luck with that

bondmen said...

The world is already working to undermine our cherished Second Amendment - the New World Order that is with Barry Hussein carrying the flag of both National & International Socialism. Maybe another cash infusion from Soros, Bloomberg and Eli Broad can grease the skids making our firearms directly into another UN statue.

Anonymous said...

As I posted on mikes blog, isn't it ironic how the trashing of "archaic" bill of rights is being done with the guardian when they admitted in an editorial a few weeks ago that they were sharing some of the NSA stories with the ny times bc American publications have a first amendment right to free speech. The British offices of the guardian were attacked and trashed by the British govt going after NSA data. They literally destroyed hard drives and computers to suppress the story. How archaic is that bill of rights again?!?!!!?