I couldn't resist homing in on that line out of context. Laughing here. Can't wait to send him this link. [More]
Herschel also has some valid observations on Daniel Defense and the banned NFL commercial.
Why, indeed, support special "Only Ones" deals?
And why would gun owners expect less from their rights leaders than they do from their hardware suppliers?
Tuesday, December 03, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Herschel always makes valid points on a variety of subjects.
Regarding the Daniel Defense commercial, I have a slightly different take.
While I abhor vendors selling to Only Ones for a discount - to the obvious detriment of mere mundanes, I think the commercial is a bit of genius.
Because many folks don't understand what a semi auto is, or how it works, due to the plethora of consistent disinformation from Authorized Urinalists,Daniel Defense's proposed "Stupid Bowl" commercial is a bit of politically correct brilliance.
We "learn" from the MSM that only military and police should have access to these tools.
They depict a veteran owning one of these guns as the best tool for the job.
Seem to me that it gives the sporting rifle platform a boost in the public eye.
I may be wrong, and have supported vendors who won't sell to Police in states that have trashed the rights of "We the People."
However, in this case, it may be a tiny step towards making sporting rifles just a little less sinister, and less menacing to the average sheep.
Post a Comment