The inclusion of the Armatix handgun on the roster “means that it ‘should’ have microstamping, but it doesn't to my knowledge have that feature,” the industry source explained. “So the question that needs to be asked is how did the gun get on the roster on October 24th of 2013? Could it be because it somehow follows the narrative that the AG's office is pushing?” [More]Today’s Gun Rights Examiner report asks a couple simple questions that ought to have simple answers. You’d think.
Thursday, February 27, 2014
California DOJ asked how ‘smart gun’ without microstamping made ‘safe’ roster
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment