Both sides should have a vested interest in apprehending anyone who would be involved in such a thing, and if they can agree on nothing else, they should be circulating the photos and information within their spheres of influence, and urging anyone with knowledge to come forward. [More]
Today’s Gun Rights Examiner report notes some common ground has been identified—providing the antis are actually sincere about wanting to reduce “gun crimes,” as opposed to counting on them.
1 comment:
"Both sides should have a vested interest in" ruling out the premeditated "implantation" of firearms in a store where it's finding will do the most to bolster the goals, standards, and (lack of) character of the anti-gun crowd.
Given the cynical viewpoint I have been forced to accept towards government and anti-gunners after constant exposure to crimes committed by government agents and anti-gunners, is it any wonder my first thought is that the most plausible exp0lanation was a disinformation loay?
Because when have you known a criminal (outside government, that is, and outside the insanity practiced by anti-gunners) to deliberately give up a gun during the commission of a crime?
Though I suppose both government agents and anti-gunners have weapons that were used in a crime and which are too hot to hold on to.
Post a Comment