That's what businesses are concerned with. [More]
People who forget that, and who attempt to drag businesses where they have no desire to go, are hardly likely to be pleased with management decisions to minimize disruption they force them to make.
One would think rifle owners would know how to stay on target better than most.
Here's the other thing: As the antis begin to perceive PR opportunities and victories from this, don't be surprised if provocateurs egging things on turn up in the ranks.
[Via Fresch Fisch]
Thursday, June 05, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Clearly, businesses have a right to decide if people can carry rifles into their stores. I pretty much put this into the same perspective as the Gay rights activists who want to be accepted as "just normal folks" then have grotesque sexual displays on parade floats.
There are clearly a lot of hoplophobes about in the country. Ramming it down their throats by carrying rifles into a store isn't my idea of how to win friends and influence people. Besides, some Prozis just cannot be convinced that guns and gun owners are not a threat.
Now, Target may decide to post "no guns" signs, making it a problem for folks who carry concealed or pistols and revolvers openly.
I don't see this form of "in-your-face, it's my right" activism - inside a business - to be in constructive.
Post a Comment