More credible would be the argument that the paper is just doing its part to help the MILMs appear more impressive and effective than they actually are, and to sway lawmakers into believing that. The target readership relying on “The Hill’s powerhouse of vehicles” for an accurate understanding of the issues makes such misuse of language all the more inexcusable. [More]My latest JPFO Alert notes words have meaning, something "journalists" know better than most.
Friday, October 03, 2014
The Hill departs from objectivity on restaurant “gun ban” story
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment