What’s evident is that the “gun safety advocates” would rather the driver had been unarmed and the people being fired upon undefended. That way, they would have been able to up their “gun violence” hysteria, plus they would have had fresh blood to dance in and exploit for more citizen disarmament edicts. [More]Today's Gun Rights Examiner report notes more people are starting to realize the truth doesn't match the desperate gun-grabber narrative.
Monday, April 20, 2015
Chicago defensive gun use refutes ‘gun safety advocate’ contentions
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment