Put simply, liberal elitists don’t like the fact that, at the end of the day, an armed citizenry can tell them, “No.” [More]Bravo. Good piece. Nice to see the concept getting wider play.
Those on "our side" trying to appear "reasonable" for the media, and calling "I Will Not Comply" activists "extremists," need to understand that at the end of the day, when their lobbying and lawsuits have failed to provide redress, the new paradigm is kicking in.
Except, as observed before, civil disobedience is not really new. It's just that gun owners have long been conditioned to limiting themselves to signing on to form emails, voting for compromised candidates and opening their wallets. That's changing.
To those unsure of if massive noncompliance can result in real, fundamental, 180° political change, I have one word: Prohibition.
3 comments:
To put it even more bluntly, politicians prefer unarmed peasants. It's probably time to resurrect that bumper sticker.
I'd make one change, "politicians" to
commissars."
Very fitting change, David.
Post a Comment