This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
Did you catch Scarborough's claim that 10% of American physicians are Muslim? Santorum just let it pass. What 'report' did he read that made such a claim, which is on its face, if you know just a little about the demographics, patently ludicrous?
I did a little research. There is no such report. What is there? A Muslim website that makes the claim, without any facts to back it up: http://www.muslimlinkpaper.com/myjumla/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1440:Muslim%20Doctors%20Abundant,%20But%20Muslim%20Hospitals%20Non-Existent&Itemid=17
So this is the kind of source Joe Scarborough is relying on for his 'data.'
Here's the long response I made to that site, which certainly won't get through their moderators: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The 'analysis' of the AMA figures is laughable--no, correct that--it'd have to improve quite a bit to make it up to 'laughable.'
Forget that your 7000 Pakistani American physicians include, by your own admission, the retired, so they cannot be counted in evaluating the AMA figure. I'll give you the 7000.
And let's even assume, as you do, that the African-American physician population is religiously identical to the broader African-American population (which is almost certainly not a reasonable assumption, given the large numbers of African-American Muslims who came to the faith while in prison--not a lot of former felons become physicians), and count those 2000 as well.
That gives you 9000, or about 1% of the AMA total. Not 10%. 1%.
Where do you propose the other 81,000 needed to get you to 10% are coming from? Indian American doctors? Only 10% of Indian Americans are Muslims, per these Pew data (http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/09/30/5-facts-about-indian-americans/), and the same research gives us only about 3 million total Indian Americans. So just to give your laughable claim every chance we can, let's assume something else that certainly isn't true, i.e., that ALL the remaining Asian physicians are Indians--yes, we'll assume there are no Chinese American doctors, no Japanese American doctors, assume they're ALL Indians.
That gives 106,000 after we take out your 7000 Pakistanis. 10% of that figure would be 11,000. So that gets you to a total of 20,000 Muslim American physicians, which is about 2% of the total.
You're still about 70,000 shy if you want to reasonably claim 10%.
Where are they?
I think it's patently clear that you're just making s#%t up as you go along.
This is unfortunately the kind of dismal, dishonest argumentative logic we have come to expect from the Muslim American community--e.g., the constant mantra of 'ISIS is not Islamic' as though simply repeating it over and over will make it true.
5 comments:
“More” link isn’t a link...
Fixed, thanks.
'Mika Brzezinski'? Wouldn't be related to Jimmy Carter's ace policy guy Zebignew, would she?
Daughter.
Did you catch Scarborough's claim that 10% of American physicians are Muslim? Santorum just let it pass. What 'report' did he read that made such a claim, which is on its face, if you know just a little about the demographics, patently ludicrous?
I did a little research. There is no such report. What is there? A Muslim website that makes the claim, without any facts to back it up: http://www.muslimlinkpaper.com/myjumla/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1440:Muslim%20Doctors%20Abundant,%20But%20Muslim%20Hospitals%20Non-Existent&Itemid=17
So this is the kind of source Joe Scarborough is relying on for his 'data.'
Here's the long response I made to that site, which certainly won't get through their moderators:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The 'analysis' of the AMA figures is laughable--no, correct that--it'd have to improve quite a bit to make it up to 'laughable.'
Forget that your 7000 Pakistani American physicians include, by your own admission, the retired, so they cannot be counted in evaluating the AMA figure. I'll give you the 7000.
And let's even assume, as you do, that the African-American physician population is religiously identical to the broader African-American population (which is almost certainly not a reasonable assumption, given the large numbers of African-American Muslims who came to the faith while in prison--not a lot of former felons become physicians), and count those 2000 as well.
That gives you 9000, or about 1% of the AMA total. Not 10%. 1%.
Where do you propose the other 81,000 needed to get you to 10% are coming from? Indian American doctors? Only 10% of Indian Americans are Muslims, per these Pew data (http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/09/30/5-facts-about-indian-americans/), and the same research gives us only about 3 million total Indian Americans. So just to give your laughable claim every chance we can, let's assume something else that certainly isn't true, i.e., that ALL the remaining Asian physicians are Indians--yes, we'll assume there are no Chinese American doctors, no Japanese American doctors, assume they're ALL Indians.
That gives 106,000 after we take out your 7000 Pakistanis. 10% of that figure would be 11,000. So that gets you to a total of 20,000 Muslim American physicians, which is about 2% of the total.
You're still about 70,000 shy if you want to reasonably claim 10%.
Where are they?
I think it's patently clear that you're just making s#%t up as you go along.
This is unfortunately the kind of dismal, dishonest argumentative logic we have come to expect from the Muslim American community--e.g., the constant mantra of 'ISIS is not Islamic' as though simply repeating it over and over will make it true.
Post a Comment