The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday threw out a 2014 federal court ruling that upheld new Colorado gun laws. [More]I suppose we should view this as an incremental "win," but why anyone should have to go through this "legal" nonsense in the first place is an intolerable outrage. Is that because no one running things is smart enough to understand what "shall not be infringed" means, or is there a different explanation?
And yeah, I agree. Stupid question.
[Via cydl]
1 comment:
I have an explanation. It keeps a lot of lawyers and judges busy.
I told my bride in 2008 that the election of Barack H. Obama could be considered the 'American Attorney Full Employment Act of 2009'.
Post a Comment