This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
"[P]ublic comments like the ones that Justice Ginsburg made could be seen as grounds for her to recuse herself from cases involving a future Trump administration. ... [It] could invite challenges to her impartiality based on her public comments."
In what court might one make such a challenge? SCOTUS is the ultimate court of appeals in our "republic". There is none! The WaPo article mentioned that in 2004, a lower-court judge was forced to apologize for appearing to advocate against Bush's reelection. Clearly the judge was forced to do so by a HIGHER COURT. But there is no higher court than SCOTUS. The Justices are ABOVE any such mundane concerns.
The Dutchman has written about "losing the mandate of heaven". This is exactly how such mandate is lost. The Left is like a horse with the bit in its teeth. I fear there is no stopping it short of a bullet in its brain. The scary thought for me is that the elites don't GIVE a good goddam about what we peed-ons think any more. Perhaps someone needs to remind them that the ratio of "indians" to "chiefs" always favors the indians.
Crooked judge, "Ratface Ruthie", should be in the Dick Tracy Museum's Villains Gallery, along with other female criminals, such as Zora Arson, Black Pearl, Sugar, Texie Garcia, and the Summer Sisters.
5 comments:
"[P]ublic comments like the ones that Justice Ginsburg made could be seen as grounds for her to recuse herself from cases involving a future Trump administration. ... [It] could invite challenges to her impartiality based on her public comments."
In what court might one make such a challenge? SCOTUS is the ultimate court of appeals in our "republic". There is none! The WaPo article mentioned that in 2004, a lower-court judge was forced to apologize for appearing to advocate against Bush's reelection. Clearly the judge was forced to do so by a HIGHER COURT. But there is no higher court than SCOTUS. The Justices are ABOVE any such mundane concerns.
The Dutchman has written about "losing the mandate of heaven". This is exactly how such mandate is lost. The Left is like a horse with the bit in its teeth. I fear there is no stopping it short of a bullet in its brain. The scary thought for me is that the elites don't GIVE a good goddam about what we peed-ons think any more. Perhaps someone needs to remind them that the ratio of "indians" to "chiefs" always favors the indians.
Ruth Buzzi Ginsberg is living proof that only the good die young.
Ginsburg has a hideously revolting mind. Talk about "bitter clinging", yeesh!
The "Mandate of Heaven" simile was first employed, AIUI
by the indomitable "Subotai Bahadur" at the PJM blog
The Belmont Club and other online forums.
The BC commentariat seems to have dispersed following
yet another revamping of PJM and there are few sites I
would miss more.
This overt partisanship is I fear a harbinger of
more to come.
Crooked judge, "Ratface Ruthie", should be in the Dick Tracy Museum's Villains Gallery, along with other female criminals, such as Zora Arson, Black Pearl, Sugar, Texie Garcia, and the Summer Sisters.
http://www.dicktracymuseum.com/headquarters/villains-gallery/
Post a Comment