This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
[SNIP] In the Texas classroom, the Mexican pledge was not intended as an indication of loyalty to Mexico. The point was to imagine what it would be like to have a loyalty that they did not necessarily possess.
Bull. One can"imagine" without being forced to violate their principles.
"Imagine" if the professor had insisted they express a belief that [insert minority group or religion or sexual orientation, etc.] should be put to death, as an exercise in "pedagogy." You'd better believe that would have "attracted attention of the the [SPLC] variety," and what a cheap, agenda-revealing shot that was.
The same people acting as apologists would insist the professor be terminated, and he would never work in "progressive" academia again.
Stare decisis would have nothing to do with that. It's simply what happens when Prozis go on a heresy witch hunt. And I doubt Noah Feldman would have felt compelled to write an essay protesting that.
3 comments:
David,
I wonder if you might comment on this:
https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-08-12/the-first-amendment-can-t-save-you-from-your-homework
[SNIP]
In the Texas classroom, the Mexican pledge was not intended as an indication of loyalty to Mexico. The point was to imagine what it would be like to have a loyalty that they did not necessarily possess.
Bull. One can"imagine" without being forced to violate their principles.
"Imagine" if the professor had insisted they express a belief that [insert minority group or religion or sexual orientation, etc.] should be put to death, as an exercise in "pedagogy." You'd better believe that would have "attracted attention of the the [SPLC] variety," and what a cheap, agenda-revealing shot that was.
The same people acting as apologists would insist the professor be terminated, and he would never work in "progressive" academia again.
Stare decisis would have nothing to do with that. It's simply what happens when Prozis go on a heresy witch hunt. And I doubt Noah Feldman would have felt compelled to write an essay protesting that.
"And I doubt Noah Feldman would have felt compelled to write an essay protesting that."
I'm thinking you would make an excellent lawyer. You can read the law.
As explained here:
* http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/03/education/edlife/how-to-learn-the-law-without-law-school.html?_r=0
[SNIP]
In Virginia, Vermont, Washington and California, aspiring lawyers can study for the bar without ever setting foot into or paying a law school.
A great tradition here in the Commonwealth.
Post a Comment