If you want to see true hate, look at some of the comments from the sick f***s rejoicing in her death. This one in particular caught my eye, captured in a screenshot in case it's removed:
 |
| [Click to enlarge] |
It's a joke, right? Can you be sure? I mean, the guy who posted that also identifies himself as @ReyMohammed and, and he's the one who publicly implied a bomb threat.
In the spirit of "If you see something, say something," I think that determination should be made by the professionals.
UPDATE: Proof the hate accusers at SPLC approved that comment:
 |
| [Click to enlarge] |
 |
| [Click to enlarge] |
8 comments:
SPLC is a hate group. They hate the Constitution, and anyone who professes fidelity to it.
And, it appears they approve hate. If posts have to be approved, and the posts include a hateful message like bombing a funeral procession, that is approved hate
My Granny taught me not to hate.
I despise the lawyers and everyone else at the SPLC.
I love you, Granny.
In their (EXTREMELY limited) defense, a lot of Disqus-run comment sections don't like hyperlinks or HTML style tags. Those automatically trip the "needs approval" requirement. I had the same problem constantly with commenting on Examiner.com articles. Same with Townhall.com articles.
Does SPLC approve of Moe's hate? Almost certainly, since it's directed at someone who supports the Constitution. But the behavior of their comment section is not proof of anything but restrictive Disqus settings.
The SPPLC is really the Southern Poverty-Pimp Lawless Center. With the exception of two incidents (the Idaho nazi church and Tom Metzger), they are just a bunch of sicophants for government tyrants. The sooner Morris Dees leaves planet earth, the better.
@Anonymous 9/08/2016 1:59 PM:
I always liked "Southern Preposterous Lie Center" as a valid working definition for SPLC.
Archer--SPLC has been notified-- his are still up (and mine was never allowed, which takes away any excuse that they don't believe in censorship). They approve the hate,the sick death wishes with a knife and scissors, including to bomb her funeral by a guy who calls himself Mohammed, which would kill her supporters. Add to that all the other comments celebrating her death by their "progressive" supporters. They are all enemies with whom no peace is possible because they don't want it and will be glad when we are all dead.
Who still thinks "it" could never happen here?
I think you misread this tweet (so easy because it is so illiterate). He said he wanted to “collect pee specimens,” and presumably “bomb” the participants with those, not something actuall explosive. Hazardous waste vs. ordnance.
Henry- Wouldn't it be wise for the FBI to check Mohammed out? After all, if we could save just one life...
Post a Comment