This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
Michael Chertoff was the guy that lied to us about the 670 mile border wall that was approved and funded by Congress. He gave us all these lame excuses why it was taking so long, or how it was such a difficult project, or why it shouldn't be built at all. Then he went into private business, made full body scanners that didn't work that soon had to be removed while he made millions off of government contracts in the process.
Now here is one of his company's 'principles' telling us how Americans can be more 'secure' if only we tweak the 2A. America's security agencies just can't do much more to stop the next Nidal Malik Hassans of the world, who telegraph what they're about to do but are ignored by the NSA because they're concentrating on real threats like Joe Sixpack from Idaho who might want to buy an AR 10.
Sorry, Pal. I trust the Founders, who codified my God-given rights in the Constitution and Bill of Rights a helluva lot more that I trust you and your Open Borders, Crony Capitalist, Globalist, Elitist buddies. When the torches and pitchforks crowd comes to D.C. I hope you're the first swamp dweller they happen to come across. (That is, just after they pick up Lois Lerner who they spotted out walking her dog in the wooded suburbs of Bethesda, Maryland.)
"Those who would exchange essential liberty for security deserve neither" B Franklin
Sometimes people question my fondness for quotes; especially from the Founders. The answer is simple. Those guys said it far better than I could hope to. Nothing wrong with cribbing so long as you crib from the best. And the libs NEVER have an answer for the Founder's words. All they can do is ad hominem attacks on the originator of the quote.
Didn't he directly lie to the American people and the US Senate when asked if any mass spying on the citizenry was taking place? Why should we trust a word he says?
7 comments:
What a self-important, redundant, asshat. FO&D Mr. Hayden.
What an amazing impression of Heinrich Himmler. He certainly is seduced by power. NOG
Michael Hayden, Principle, The Chertoff Group.
Michael Chertoff was the guy that lied to us about the 670 mile border wall that was approved and funded by Congress. He gave us all these lame excuses why it was taking so long, or how it was such a difficult project, or why it shouldn't be built at all.
Then he went into private business, made full body scanners that didn't work that soon had to be removed while he made millions off of government contracts in the process.
Now here is one of his company's 'principles' telling us how Americans can be more 'secure' if only we tweak the 2A. America's security agencies just can't do much more to stop the next Nidal Malik Hassans of the world, who telegraph what they're about to do but are ignored by the NSA because they're concentrating on real threats like Joe Sixpack from Idaho who might want to buy an AR 10.
Sorry, Pal. I trust the Founders, who codified my God-given rights in the Constitution and Bill of Rights a helluva lot more that I trust you and your Open Borders, Crony Capitalist, Globalist, Elitist buddies. When the torches and pitchforks crowd comes to D.C. I hope you're the first swamp dweller they happen to come across. (That is, just after they pick up Lois Lerner who they spotted out walking her dog in the wooded suburbs of Bethesda, Maryland.)
Call me crazy, but we didn't have "these" problems when "they" weren't here in large numbers...just sayin
Traitorous son-of-a-bitch.
"Those who would exchange essential liberty for security deserve neither"
B Franklin
Sometimes people question my fondness for quotes; especially from the Founders. The answer is simple. Those guys said it far better than I could hope to. Nothing wrong with cribbing so long as you crib from the best. And the libs NEVER have an answer for the Founder's words. All they can do is ad hominem attacks on the originator of the quote.
Didn't he directly lie to the American people and the US Senate when asked if any mass spying on the citizenry was taking place? Why should we trust a word he says?
Post a Comment