What do you think? [More]
Looks like fodder for a longer article to me. But not today. I've already put in my time.
Nice of some of them to admit what some of us have been warning against.
I do wonder when's the last time Shelley made it down to the range...?
[Via Sam L]
Thursday, April 13, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
As was said elsewhere, deny me the ballot, and I vote by the bullet.
Wouldn't it take a constitutional amendment to disenfranchise white males? And exactly how might the term "white male" be defined? I mean, leaving aside the whole "white" thing, and just looking at the "male" part, how would these mokes define "male". Would it only include biological males or would FtoM trans people qualify? What about former biological males who have XY chromosomes but have undergone a penectomy, orchiectomy and plastic surgery to completely remodel their groin. What about Fully intact, fully functional biological males who "identify" as female. Do they get a pass because they "identify" as female? Would a biological female who dresses and acts like a male? Do they lose their right to vote?
The "white" part of the specification should be even MORE fun to define. Are these people really stupid/ignorant/insane enough to think this is something which is actually do-able? Seriously???
Post a Comment