Because evidently the danger of “untested” guns that make them “unsafe” to be owned by the rest of us mundanes goes away when transferred to the capable hands of “trained professionals.” How that is so, when a gun making the “safe” list has nothing to do with operator skill and everything to do with manufacturers paying a fee to the state, is left unsaid. But the bottom line is, police are the “Only Ones” exempted and mere “civilians” (yeah, I know, that’s why it’s in quotation marks) will have their lives destroyed if they get caught violating the “rules.” [More]
So the guy's against guns unless being for them for a favored group works to his political advantage...? Yep, sounds like equal justice for all to me...
2 comments:
The CCDL had an interesting argument in it's lawsuit against Connecticut. It involved the constitutional prohibition against the establishment of a class of nobility. The suit was combined with the New York suit, and got side tracked with the death of Scalia. I really would have liked to hear a Supreme Court opinion and comments on that.
Ever since my state has gained Constitutional Carry, I have divested 75% of my annual citizen's defense league donation dollars to California's branch. They need it much more than WV.
Post a Comment