This is a placeholder for now because I have not had ads on this blog for years. In case I ever start up again, this will be the policy in effect:
The FTC has some fool nonsense rules about ads on blogs or some such and presumes authority over the First Amendment to compel the unfunded mandate that we who earn ad revenues make some kind of disclosure so you don't think we're getting paid to say nice things about people or God knows what, meaning they must think you're stupid, too. I have had a few ads on this site in the past and may do so again if I think it's worth a try. Combined, I probably couldn't buy a box of good cigars each year, let alone a bottle of George T. Stagg, and that is somehow supposed to compromise my morality to force me to say nice things about products and services I don't mean simply in exchange for filthy lucre. If you believe that, leave now--you're not smart enough to be here. Bottom line, aside from welcoming a sponsor, I will do no posts related to their products or services, or reviews of what they offer.
About "The Only Ones"
The purpose of this feature has never been to bash cops. The only reason I do this is to amass a credible body of evidence to present when those who would deny our right to keep and bear arms use the argument that only government enforcers are professional and trained enough to do so safely and responsibly. And it's also used to illustrate when those of official status, rank or privilege, both in law enforcement and in some other government position, get special breaks not available to we commoners, particularly (but not exclusively) when they're involved in gun-related incidents.
Comment House Rules
Keep them on topic. No spam. No threats against anyone except me. Do not feed trolls--I'll take out the trash. Try to keep it clean. I'm the final arbiter. If you don't like the rules, start your own damn blog.
Link Policy
WarOnGuns reciprocates links with liberty-oriented sites promoting the right to keep and bear arms for all peaceable individuals. If you have linked to me and don't see your site below, it's probably just because I haven't noticed it yet. Shoot me an email via the "Contact Form" (see above in this sidebar) if you want to fix that.
As a general rule I remove links for blogs that have been inactive for over one year.
"Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force."
Or at least preparedness and willingness to use it...
2 comments:
Henry
said...
Apparently, this “Free Speech Rally” is being held in a Phony Gun-Free Zone (Boston Common). In my opinion, this is an error that lovers of liberty should consciously avoid committing whenever possible. Leave GFZs for the Brady Bunch rallies to cower inside.
Care to cite the MGL that prohibits possession of a firearm on Boston Common?
There are City of Boston Park regulations, which can result in a $50 fine and raise serious Constitutionality issues:
http://www.cityofboston.gov/Parks/rules.asp
The first regulation is one that sets the tone for the rest:
"SECTION 1. No person shall, in any public park (including any boundary road thereof), or other public place (including any parkway) under the control of the Parks and Recreation Commission:
(a) abuse or annoy another; ..."
That by itself can be annoying and potentially abusive.
"SECTION 6. No person shall, in any public park (including any boundary road thereof) or other public place (including any parkway) under the control of the Parks and Recreation Commission; unless under a lease or concession granted under Chapter 365 of the Acts of 1897, and unless a written permit be on their person or prominently displayed, engage in any commercial enterprise or solicit business or display or distribute any commercial advertising matter; nor shall any person, except in accordance with a written permit from the Commissioner of Parks and Recreation, have or drive in or on any such park or place (or boundary road or parkway) any vehicle having a seating capacity of more than eight passengers."
Uh-oh. Those people who have three row seating in their mini-vans like a 1965 VW bus are going to face a $50 fine!
"SECTION 2. No person shall, in any public park (including any boundary road thereof), or other public place (including any parkway) under the control of the Parks and Recreation Commission, except under the auspices of public authority: ... (i) throw any stone or other missile; or ... (l) discharge any firearm or destructive weapon; or
(m) have in any such park or place, except a boundary road or parkway on which there are dwellings, any firearm or destructive weapon; or
(n) go on foot on any drive or bridle path except to go directly across from the walk to another; or
(o) sit, stand or lie upon lawn areas in the Public Garden except such lawn areas designated as sitting areas."
So, possession and/or discharge of a firearm is as serious an offense to the City of Boston as walking on the grass or a bridle path, yet those activities are not protected by the Second Amendment.
2 comments:
Apparently, this “Free Speech Rally” is being held in a Phony Gun-Free Zone (Boston Common). In my opinion, this is an error that lovers of liberty should consciously avoid committing whenever possible. Leave GFZs for the Brady Bunch rallies to cower inside.
Care to cite the MGL that prohibits possession of a firearm on Boston Common?
There are City of Boston Park regulations, which can result in a $50 fine and raise serious Constitutionality issues:
http://www.cityofboston.gov/Parks/rules.asp
The first regulation is one that sets the tone for the rest:
"SECTION 1. No person shall, in any public park (including any boundary road thereof), or other public place (including any parkway) under the control of the Parks and Recreation Commission:
(a) abuse or annoy another; ..."
That by itself can be annoying and potentially abusive.
"SECTION 6. No person shall, in any public park (including any boundary road thereof) or other public place (including any parkway) under the control of the Parks and Recreation Commission; unless under a lease or concession granted under Chapter 365 of the Acts of 1897, and unless a written permit be on their person or prominently displayed, engage in any commercial enterprise or solicit business or display or distribute any commercial advertising matter; nor shall any person, except in accordance with a written permit from the Commissioner of Parks and Recreation, have or drive in or on any such park or place (or boundary road or parkway) any vehicle having a seating capacity of more than eight passengers."
Uh-oh. Those people who have three row seating in their mini-vans like a 1965 VW bus are going to face a $50 fine!
"SECTION 2. No person shall, in any public park (including any boundary road thereof), or other public place (including any parkway) under the control of the Parks and Recreation Commission, except under the auspices of public authority:
...
(i) throw any stone or other missile; or
...
(l) discharge any firearm or destructive weapon; or
(m) have in any such park or place, except a boundary road or parkway on which there are dwellings, any firearm or destructive weapon; or
(n) go on foot on any drive or bridle path except to go directly across from the walk to another; or
(o) sit, stand or lie upon lawn areas in the Public Garden except such lawn areas designated as sitting areas."
So, possession and/or discharge of a firearm is as serious an offense to the City of Boston as walking on the grass or a bridle path, yet those activities are not protected by the Second Amendment.
Post a Comment