Yeah, John, we know they're monopoly of violence fascists. [More]
So why are you actively abetting the cultural and political terraforming that will enable them to take over the entire Republic?
In addition to explaining the California experience, produce credible data – something that can be independently validated – that “amnesty” and a “pathway to citizenship” for MILLIONS of foreign nationals in this country illegally (and even legally, with current culturally suicidal policies) WILL NOT overwhelmingly favor Democrats and anti-gunners. Show us your sources and methodologies for determining this WILL NOT result in supermajorities in state and federal legislatures that will be able to pass all kinds of anti-gun edicts.
Show us how this WILL NOT result in nominations and confirmations of judges to the Supreme and federal courts who will uphold those edicts, and reverse gains made to date. The sudden passing of Justice Scalia, and the precarious balances of the Heller and McDonald decisions, ought to drive home for all how dangerously critical that is.
Notice I didn’t ask you for platitudes, or for anecdotes about exceptions to the rule, or about who is turning up in increasing numbers at gun stores and ranges – that doesn’t matter if you can’t point to a corresponding overriding shift in voting trends. I didn’t ask for wishful speculation about how education and outreach programs MIGHT help bring more over to the NRA side.
I asked you to show how all credible estimates putting the disparity at over 70% Democrat and anti-gun are wrong (and how the needle barely moves in the right direction after 20 years). If you think that can be changed, you’re going to need to be specific about how (assuming it can be done, which you’ll also need to spell out), and how by then the damage won’t be irreversible, beyond any kind of beltway insider political “solution.”
Like Grover Norquist, NRA and everyone else I've issued this challenge to, you won't directly and unequivocally answer it either, because you can't.
Friday, August 11, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
August 11, 2017 at 1:20 PM
"Your comment is awaiting moderation........"
The Left-“Libertarian” deluge-immigration and dhimmigration policies to which folks like John Stossel, Grover Norquist, CATO, “Reason”, and The “Independent” Institute subscribe are achieving what “Democrats” and foreign totalitarian enemies such as fascists and communists could never have practically dreamed of actually doing:
1. Overwhelming the voting control of the relatively conservative native-born U.S. citizen. Example: See California.
2. Permanent supermajority of anti-gun “Democrats” in all branches of the federal government and a supermajority of the states. Example: See California.
3. Direct and indirect massive redistribution of wealth and income. See California.
4. Global government. The inevitable result.
In other words, destruction of the meaning and value of citizenship, of our Right to Keep and Bear Arms, and of the USA as an free or even independent constitutional republic.
Left “Libertarians” oppose borders, sovereignty, and exclusive citizenship rights. They claim immigration limits and controls are unconscionable and amount to “slavery”. They believe there should be no limit on the number of people who should be able to come to the USA and enjoy rights, privileges and immunities equal to those of American citizens, including of course, instant de facto co-ownership of property held in trust by government for the American citizenry (redistribution), and voting — which at supermajority levels — let’s not delude ourselves — becomes the power to redistribute and oppress, bot illegally and LEGALLY in countless ways, up to and including altering the US Constitution.
The world’s population is approaching 8 billion, several billions of whom are not only poorer than the typical Mexican “undocumented immigrant”, but live in places that vastly more dangerous and oppressive than Mexico. In Left “Libertarian” utopia of unlimited immigration, literally billions of people would be better off coming to the USA rather than staying where they are, EVEN IF the USA did away with ALL forms of “welfare” and government “services”.
Imagine, Welcome to the USA: Population 3 billion. Besides the obvious crushing of our quality of life in countless ways, these three billion 3rd worlders could and would vote to redistribute our wealth and income, and progressively strip us of liberties, including gun rights.
Left “Libertarians” (who are not real Libertarians) are de facto globalists (anarcho-globalists if you will) and immigration-socialists. Their immigration policies work to destroy all the liberties they claim to support — except for the “liberty” to come here at will, out-vote us, and culturally terraform the USA.
Because they oppose the most fundamental prerequisites for the existence of the USA as an independent nation — borders and non-suicidal immigration limits and criteria — Left “Libertarians” cannot honestly take the constitutional oath of office or even the pledge of allegiance. They are not and cannot be loyal Americans.
Because Left-“Libertarians” (who are not true libertarians) can pass themselves off as compatible with conservatives and republicans, which nazis and communists can’t, they are vastly more damaging than any other enemy of the USA, domestic or foreign.
You keep challenging people to prove a negative. Since you're lots smarter than the stereotypical "box of rocks", I have to presume you already know this to be a logical impossibility.
Tsk.
Oh bull. I've presented plenty of positive evidence. If you want to refute it, present positive evidence of your own that does.
Using your evasion, if I said "Prove the sun is not hot," you'd object.
Instead, what you've done (and keep doing) is once more proven you can't refute my contentions. Then you pull your "Tsk" shit, like you've got some kind of libertarian moral high ground for defending the destruction of the Republic as planned by the collectivists.
Come up with some facts or stop wasting my time and projecting your Rexchead rockhead on to me.
Wow, Carlos says what I think.
As a courtesy, he posted his comment here what he said over at AL.
Amazingly, it seems not everyone appreciates his insight. Now why would that be?
Rexxhead is an anklebiting douche. The claim that you can't prove a negative is really tiresome. Sometimes you can indeed prove a negative, by disproving the opposite.
In any case, SEE CALIFORNIA and other massive secular empirical evidence of the REAL world effects of over-immigration and invasion-occupation fast breeding. "Prove that won't continue" is another way of saying there is enormous evidence that it will continue. And it's no big mystery why.
How many of these left libertarians actually step up to the plate to house and clothe these low-IQ non-skilled (((experts at extracting benefits from US Taxpayers)))?
And I'm not talking about Hollywood actors or politicians who hire some as nannies and house maids. For instance,JK Rowling has numerous mansions with hundreds of empty rooms, and champions the invasion of the UK by "refugees" -- yet houses none of them.
STFU,"libertarian" hypocrites -- put your money where your mouth is. Incidentally, "showing estimates are wrong" is not asking someone to prove a negative, Rexxtard.
Didn't a fellow named Noam Chomsky tell us, "Intent can be inferred from predictable outcomes?" When he's right, he's right!
A plank of the Democratic platform since 2010 has been "To ensure that demography is destiny." They've admitted they want to replace us with a billion IQ-55 Third World sewer rats in human form, because it's so much easier to rule peasants than free men. And they know we know.
We aren't going to be voting our way out of this.
Post a Comment