The absence of further High Court action since 2010 and the lack of any explanation for declining to hear these cases mean we can only speculate on the reasons. Are judges who favor easing up on infringements waiting for a retirement or two from their ranks before they’ll deem it safe to move forward, or does this mean the majority owes its first and foremost loyalties to an establishment that thinks this business of an armed populace has gone far enough? [More]
As Dr. King observed, a right delayed is a right denied.
2 comments:
The way you get a case to the SCOTUS is to win at the state or appeals level and the party seeking to limit rights appeals to SCOTUS. It would seem the majority have an interest in that agenda.
Apparently, the Second Amendment is all about hunting ducks, and so is the US Supreme Court.
Post a Comment