Thursday, April 26, 2018

Poll Dancing

So, if school safety was actually the issue, please explain to me why hundreds of elementary age kids were accessible by anyone who wanted to walk onto campus today? [More]
Fair question.  Then again, were it not a "gun-free zone," it would most likely be a moot one.

And as for poll workers injecting their own politics into the process, it would be helpful in the future to go in with cellphone set to record.

I would have challenged such an abuser on the spot, writtten down his name and the names of other workers and voters within earshot, seen if any would corroborate it, and immediately reported it and then followed up with election authorities. Since Arizona requires:
Appointments are made from a list of precinct voters submitted by party chairmen at least 90 days before election. Inspectors, marshals & judges shall be members of the two political parties which cast the highest number of votes in the state at the last preceding general election, and shall be divided equally between those parties. There shall be an equal number of inspectors in the various precincts in the county who are members of the two largest political parties. Where the inspector is a member of one party, the marshal shall be a member of the other major party.
I'm wondering how there wasn't an immediate challenge by those in charge,and would recommend the person making this claim file a formal, detailed complaint.

[Via Tristan M]

1 comment:

Henry said...

Ah, but if you’re inside a SCHOOL which is also a POLLING PLACE, that makes it a double-plus ungood Gun Free Zone. So the kiddies are twice as safe. See?