The Deschutes County sheriff would decide whether any local, state or federal gun law is unconstitutional under the measure’s broader interpretations of those rights. And if the sheriff thinks a law is unconstitutional, the measure would forbid the county from enforcing it. Individual violations could result in a fine of up to $2,000. [More]Do you really want to give that kind of power to one man?
Thursday, April 19, 2018
Things Must Be Pretty Bad if This is 'Better'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
A trial judge can nullify a jury’s guilty verdict, but cannot overturn a not-guilty verdict. How is this different? This man does not get to make new law, he gets to nullify existing law. Well, so do I.
I believe this goes here:
Dan has left a new comment on your post "Capture the Flag and Send a Message to Your Repres...":
If the blackmrobed pirates in the judiciary would obey the Constitution there would not be talk like this. Not sure how having a sheriff decide unconstitutional vs constitutional is worse than having a judge do so. At least a sheriff is answerable to the voters. Many judges once appointed are there for life with zero accountability to anyone.
Post a Comment