About the YouTube shooter...?
Here's the archive of her webpage. I suggest you get what you want from it before it's forced off. And you can still find related stuff on Facebook.
Man, she wasn't kidding about being censored. If I had to guess, I'd say videos with titles like "Health Risks of Anal Sex" probably didn't endear her to the censors of San Bruno.
This won't do anything to reverse the company's position on gun-related videos but will probably make the excusion even stronger. I would look for a lot more sensitive leeway for Iranians and vegans, though...
Damn the NRA, right?
3 comments:
Gunz bad
How did Youtube abuse a woman so badly that she felt compelled to start shooting at them and then kill herself?
Our tech masters want us totally disarmed so that they can abuse us with impunity.
Social media should be regulated as a public utility with the idea that if it's legal it's allowed, this being a free speech country, for the most part, except for the "hate-speechers" who want to ban any speech with which they disagree.
Youtube's suppression of gun videos contradicts the First Amendment and the Second Amendment. They're anti-American, totalitarian communists like that. Our government needs to tell them, "No, you can't do that to Americans because it's wrong."
I'm having a little trouble accessing my sense of grief for the employees working on Skynet. So we're talking about a company and a state chock full of people who would be very OK with me and mine being murdered by state workers if I don't register and turn in my weapons. And it's a sanctuary state, welcoming in some of the most violent gutter trash on the planet. They'll get down right cross with you if you try and tell them that that isn't such a grand idea.
So yeah...you couldn't dare me to care about any of those people. At least the nuts who shot up that government office in San Bernardino were better shots.
Post a Comment