One of the ideas promoted by the anti-gunners is that “we have a right to feel safe.” Since how we feel is subjective, and since two people can have different reactions to the same situation, there is no universal consensus. Hoplophobes have no right to impose their neuroses on the rest of us any more than narcissists have a right to expect us to agree with their self-assessment of wonderfulness. [More]Who thinks this "reasonable restriction" is all they want?
4 comments:
"One of the ideas promoted by the anti-gunners is that “we have a right to feel safe.”
"...freedom from want and freedom from fear..."
Thank you, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, you lying sack of socialism.
I see dots on that map from such Brady-approved states as CA, IL, MA, NY and NJ is completely covered in red dots. I conclude all those Brady-approved gun laws did NOT work to prevent mass murders (>3 persons)not mass "shootings." So why impose them on my state's population? We are proudly F-rated in South Carolina, and while we have had mass murders and attempted mass murders, they have been few in number.
Their trick is to conflate numbers with rates to mask over fewer actual incidents or casualties in lower population states, where, incidentally, the highest numbers occur in the Democrat urban enclaves.
But I don’t *feel* safe unless I’m carrying my handgun. So it’s my right to do so, regardless. Right?
Post a Comment