The ATF said that’s not the case, and that they won’t destroy any surrendered bump stocks until all applicable litigation over the matter has been adjudicated. [More]If that's the case, why did our judge decide "The plaintiff cannot prevail without a “substantial indication of likely success on the merits”?
That agency-wide rule seems a pretty substantial indication they're counting on rubber stamp judges giving "deference" to the administrative bullsh!t du jour instead of on justice and the law.
[Via Bear]
No comments:
Post a Comment