What would you have done? [More]I've not been in that situation, but I do know I've moved toward danger before to protect those I care about. Haven't you?
The alternative is we can't have guns and the ones who can are frozen in the headlights?
And when did Peterson sign anything saying he would risk his life by confronting a heavily armed killer?Right there on the bottom of the damn job application.
5 comments:
Yes.
When seconds count, the cowards are only hours away.
While it is very difficult to talk about what he did or didn't do, without punching gun control-supporting imbeciles in the piehole, there is one question that needs to be asked (or, if it is already asked, then it needs to be asked more often):
if it was not this POS's job to protect the children, then WTF *was* his job?
One similar POS like that (they are all the same) once got my daughter suspended by seeing an empty vodka bottle in my teenage daughter's (actually, *my*) car, even though her blood alcohol test showed precisely zero alcohol, and I had never consented to a search of MY car.
If these subhuman feces' jobs description include crap like that, then why do they carry guns on school property, which is a gun-free zone? I hope it's not for the sole purpose of shooting teenagers in case they refuse to submit to these POS's "authoritah"?
"To Serve, and to PROTECT"!
Thats why they are prosecuting him. Someone realized that the "only the police should have guns' narrative took a huge hit with this one. If they dont hold him accountable for this or at least make a show out of it, then people will begin to realize that they are their only form of protection. And that means increased gun owners and an increased push for concealed carry.
If it's not his job to confront a heavily armed killer, why is he carrying a gun?
_revjen45
Post a Comment