While the Second Amendment protects a right to bear arms, it does not require taxpayers to subsidize the exercise of that right. [More]The hell it doesn't, you liar.
If we did, those abusing it would be taken care of in short order.
Thursday, August 29, 2019
Licky Liccardo
If we did, those abusing it would be taken care of in short order.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
“Of course, “the crooks” won’t pay a fee or buy insurance; only law-abiding gun owners would... The insurance thereby provides an additional tool for law enforcement against crooks. A prospective burglar casing a home or a criminal standing watch on a street corner may avoid arrest due to lack of demonstrable criminality. Yet if a constitutionally compliant pat-down search revealed possession of an uninsured gun, the suspect would face the consequences of an uninsured motorist, including a fine, misdemeanor conviction and seizure of the gun.”
What an asshole. If there’s no suspicion of criminality, how do you define a “constitutionally-compliant pat-down search?”
Even if the search is possible, this moron thinks he needs something other than the perp’s previous felony record (pardon me, his “record of justice system involvement”) to close the deal.
But hey, make the population of San Jose jump through whagtever hoops you please. They deserve it for actually electing a f*wit like you.
Post a Comment